I’m realizing there is perhaps a distinction between believing in Christ - that deep, intimate faith - and a belief in what religious adherence can do to a society and to the individuals within a Christian group, the effects of which are undeniably positive.
Despite what skeptics may say about religions being the cause of all wars, I would hate to see a world without morality. If Christianity has historically provided us (in the West) with this morality, then why mess with a good thing?
Despite what skeptics may say about religions being the cause of all wars, I would hate to see a world without morality. If Christianity has historically provided us (in the West) with this morality, then why mess with a good thing?
So while I am a skeptic, I can go to Church without practicing or believing, just by being in attendance. But I can't be a hypocrite and pretend I'm a believer when I'm not. This raises an ethical problem, namely how to belong to the church group without "leading people on" to believe I am a practicing Christian.
Church attendance will benefit my family more than anything. I don't think there's anything wrong with researching, studying, and documenting my observations on the side.
Some of the books I would like to read, mentioned in the Steven Pinker clips:
- In Gods We Trust by Scott Adams
- The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins
- papers on fictive kinship by Alan Fisk (sp?)
Some of the books I would like to read, mentioned in the Steven Pinker clips:
- In Gods We Trust by Scott Adams
- The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins
- papers on fictive kinship by Alan Fisk (sp?)
No comments:
Post a Comment